For those used to live colourful life with flamboyance are a worried lot today. The spate of incidents involving rape or attempted rape, sexual misconduct and harassment of women by people including rich and famous persons have focused the nation’s attention demanding punishment of the guilty.
Farooq Abdullah is known for his flamboyant lifestyle.
Even at this age, he takes dance floors and enjoys late night parties that have
glamour and beauty along with choicest wines and whiskies. It is nobody’s
business to peep into another’s private life. What the Union Minister and tall
leader of the National Conference does in his private moments is his business.
But a public figure carries accountability to the people and to the nation on
his shoulders. It was here that Farooq erred on Friday, December 6, 2013 when
he inadvertently remarked on the prevailing mood of the country vis a vis
women’s chastity.
Farooq was casual when he told a group of reporters
outside Parliament House, “Ab to ladkiyons se baat karne mein dar lagata hai”.(
Now I fear talking to girls). He went on to say that the situation in the
country has come to a point when one fears even appointing a woman as
secretary. Better send all men to jail”.
All hell broke loose. News channels went viral and
women activists were up in arms against Farooq’s remark. True, simple
interpretation of his statement goes against the dignity of women. Talking to
women will not lead anyone to jail or even keeping a woman secretary is all right.
There is remote possibility of a woman misusing or better say abusing her
gender to make false and fabricated complaint against her boss or against
anyone who comes into contact with her. But that possibility cannot be ruled
out altogether. Farooq Abdullah has this in mind when he aired his views to the
media.
But interpretation and more than this it is perception
that matters. If a person does not make advances against a woman, if he does
not try to make physical contact or pass lewd comments, he has nothing to fear
in the company of girls. Problem arises when men start taking undue advantage
of the situation while being in the company of women.
Rules have changed and so have the laws. Despite this,
there are regular incidents of men assaulting women sexually; the only thing is
that all the incidents are not reported. Women fear the society and fear the
men who are rich and powerful enough to ruin the life of the victim. Look at
the case of the victim journalist who was assaulted by her editor Tarun Tejpal
in a Goa hotel. The woman journalist took some time in mustering the courage to
report the matter to her Managing Editor, Shoma Chaudhary, also a woman. But
for the leak of the e-mails, the Tejpal case would not have come to the public
domain and the culprit would not have been in police custody now.
I desist to comment on the other much hyped and
publicized incident of a law intern who wrote in her blog that she suffered
unwelcome behavior from a judge of the Supreme Court Justice A k Ganguly who
since has retired from the Supreme Court. The girl wrote her blog almost a year
after the incident took place in a five star hotel of Delhi. The UPA Government was terribly unhappy with
Justice Ganguly because he strictly monitored and wrote judgment in the 2G scam.
Is there any angle of motivation in the complaint notwithstanding the three
member panel has found prima facie veracity in the complaint of the law intern.
~R. K. Sinha
No comments:
Post a Comment